国产热热热精品,亚洲视频久久】日韩,三级婷婷在线久久,99人妻精品视频,精品九热人人肉肉在线,AV东京热一区二区,91po在线视频观看,久久激情宗合,青青草黄色手机视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Europe

Time to play the import card

By Mei Xinyu | China Daily European Weekly | Updated: 2011-08-05 11:13
Share
Share - WeChat

China must use its big domestic market to counter rising trade protectionism

The recent World Trade Organization ruling that the European Union is illegally taxing Chinese steel fasteners is of great significance and will help Chinese enterprises enjoy better competitive conditions in the international market.

The WTO's appellate body said in its ruling on July 15 that the EU isn't complying with international commerce rules by imposing anti-dumping duties on Chinese-made fasteners.

The EU imposed anti-dumping duties of 26.5 to 85 percent on all Chinese fastener pieces for a five-year period in January 2009. China filed a complaint with the WTO later.

It is China's first victory against the EU at the WTO, 10 years after the country joined the Geneva-based global trade body.

The move will encourage more Chinese companies to defend their rights in dealing with unfair anti-dumping rules. The fastener industry is of relatively small scale, with most companies small- and medium-sized. Since they can win, why can't some bigger industries and larger companies?

In this case, China has changed the EU's unfair trade rules against Chinese goods by applying the WTO laws, setting a good example to take the initiative to "push forward the evolution of rules" instead of passively "following international practices".

Inspired by this victory, there will be more occasions where Chinese companies employ the WTO laws and dispute settlement mechanism to urge Western partners to change unfair trade rules. On the other hand, Chinese companies have to consider carefully when they want to impose unjust trade restrictions.

However, China is more likely to deal with unfair trade rules made by non-Western countries through bilateral negotiations, instead of appealing to the multilateral mechanism.

The main reason is that Western nations are unwilling to take the highly efficient, but low-cost bilateral negotiations, as they believe they may have a better chance to win trade disputes through the multi-lateral mechanism.

The current WTO rules are made under the Western domination, thus representing more of their interests.

Meanwhile, China's victory in this case, by increasing the confidence of Chinese companies and other developing members to use WTO rules to defend their rights, will benefit the organization's own development.

Dominated by Western countries in legislation, the WTO laws seem to always serve their interests instead of those of the developing members, who seem never to have the chance to win, even if it is China, the world's second largest economy. In that case, the organization will be unable to continue without the support of the developing members.

In the international trade dispute arena, China often finds itself positioned as the defendant. Beside the trade rules (including some fundamental ones and the huge compromise China made when joining the WTO), a more important reason is that China mainly is the exporter, but importers enjoy more rights.

Europe and the United States constitute the world's largest import markets. To keep these key markets, export companies usually have to accept import countries' restrictions, and even humiliations.

As a result, to better deal with trade disputes, except actively coping under the current ruling system, and exerting efforts to construct a global mechanism more beneficial to ourselves, China needs to think about how to make proper use of its increasing import rights as a fast growing import country and a market crucial to an increasing number of companies around the world, to help our citizens and companies to gain fair treatment overseas.

We can have a look at the huge capacities of the domestic market. Merely from the perspective of the retailing of consumer goods, there is already a big market that is growing rapidly.

Between 2000 and 2009 China's retail sales enjoyed an average annual growth of more than 13 percent. Retail sales hit 12.5 trillion yuan (1.36 trillion euros) in 2009, among which the wholesaling and retailing sales' value of tradable goods was 10.54 trillion yuan, or $1.5 trillion, much higher than the value of goods China exported that year, $1.2 trillion.

China's retail sales rose 18.4 percent year on year to 15.46 trillion yuan last year.

As the biggest victim of global trade protectionism during the past 10 years, China is now confronted with a new surge of trade protectionism.

However, we have also been endowed with strong import capacity by the tremendous domestic market and huge sum of foreign exchange reserves. Exercising the import rights properly will help China's trade partners realize their real interests and can prevent their domestic protectionism from imposing unjust rules on Chinese companies and citizens, contributing to build a fair and open competition stage for all players.

The author is a scholar with the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation.

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
乌拉特中旗| 元谋县| 饶河县| 泰州市| 北安市| 星座| 辛集市| 日土县| 祁东县| 大安市| 平遥县| 宁南县| 闽侯县| 吴忠市| 潮州市| 新干县| 江华| 开远市| 玉溪市| 鹤岗市| 乐业县| 克东县| 永善县| 卓资县| 崇左市| 乌拉特后旗| 拜城县| 商河县| 勐海县| 海伦市| 潢川县| 仲巴县| 泊头市| 定远县| 安宁市| 财经| 高安市| 陆河县| 张掖市| 永嘉县| 浠水县|